How we talk to each other really counts. Clear and respectful communication between reviewers and authors is key for improving research. But sometimes, words can get in the way. Think about confusing feedback or comments that feel a bit too critical. To steer clear of these issues, reviewers need to use language wisely. Let's dive into some tips to help reviewers give feedback that is clear, positive, and valuable for authors.

Language tips for Peer Reviewers

• Ensure that your feedback is clear, concise, and directly addresses the specific elements of the manuscript.

• Clearly articulate your thoughts, avoiding ambiguity to guide authors effectively.

2. Consider word choice for sentiment

• Be mindful of the tone conveyed by your language. Choose words that convey your critique constructively rather than negatively.

• Employ language that encourages improvement and collaboration rather than discouragement.

3. Maintain a neutral tone

• Strive for a neutral and objective tone in your critiques. This fosters an atmosphere of professionalism and constructive engagement.

• Avoid language that may be interpreted as personal or overly critical.

4. Organize critiques effectively

• Structure your feedback in a logical and organized manner. This facilitates the author's understanding and implementation of suggested changes.

• Use headings or bullet points to break down complex feedback into manageable sections.

5. Avoid informality

• Maintain a formal and professional tone in all communications. Avoid colloquial language or overly casual expressions.

• Uphold the standards of academic discourse, reflecting the seriousness of the peer-review process.

6. Avoid long sentences without correct punctuation

• Opt for clear and concise sentences. Long, convoluted sentences can lead to misunderstandings and hinder the author's comprehension.

• Ensure proper punctuation to enhance the readability of your feedback.

7. Avoid offensive language

• Exercise sensitivity in your language choices to prevent unintended offense. Respectful and considerate language promotes a collaborative and positive peer-review experience.

• Focus on the content and ideas rather than making personal judgments.

8. Provide detailed feedback

• Offer specific examples to support your critiques. Detail is key to helping authors understand and address the identified issues effectively.

• Avoid vague language and provide actionable recommendations for improvement.

9. Positive reinforcement

• Acknowledge and highlight the strengths of the manuscript alongside areas for improvement. Positive reinforcement encourages authors and fosters a supportive scholarly community.

• Balancing criticism with praise creates a more constructive and motivating feedback environment.

10. Constructive criticism

• Frame your critiques in a constructive manner. Instead of merely pointing out flaws, provide suggestions for improvement.

• Help authors understand how to enhance their work rather than focusing solely on what needs correction.

By integrating these language tips into the peer-review process, reviewers contribute not only to the refinement of individual manuscripts but also to the collective advancement of scholarly discourse and knowledge.